mardi 7 juin 2011

camila amor eterno

camila amor eterno. se compara amor eterno~ao
  • se compara amor eterno~ao


  • neerajkandhari
    06-04 07:47 AM
    CIS should not have asked for an Affidavit of Support, but the other documents are normal. It is not unheard of for employment-based I-485 applicants to be interviewed, but usually they are not called if the priority date is not current. CIS might have confused your case with a family matter. However, you should attend the interview, and send all documents they request except the I-864. You can explain that an Aff. of Support should not be required in an EB case.

    I have recently left my job I have another job offer with the same position and same and higher salary can they pay me via 1099
    I had my wife start a business can i work in the same position in her business with same or higher salary can i do 1099 instead of W2

    please Advice




    camila amor eterno. 3- Camila Ferreira da Silva
  • 3- Camila Ferreira da Silva


  • GoneSouth
    04-17 06:42 PM
    This is effectively a non-compete clause. Enforcement of non-compete clauses varies by state, but most states include "broadness" as a criteria in deciding if a particular non-compete clause is enforceable or not. (e.g., read this article about ohio (http://tinyurl.com/2oysd8) or this article about colorado (http://tinyurl.com/2q6hcd) ... your state may vary) The restriction of "can't work for any IT business anywhere in the US" is indeed extremely broad.

    Based on my google law degree ;) , I'd say this particular clause is not enforceable. If it were me, I'd sign the contract with a smile, get the three year extension, then find a new employer. Your old employer may sue you, but it's unlikely they'd win.

    This is just a guess though. Check with a lawyer.

    - GS




    camila amor eterno. Amor eterno. 4:27. Homenagem a minha namorada, com uma linda trilha sonora.
  • Amor eterno. 4:27. Homenagem a minha namorada, com uma linda trilha sonora.


  • chanlal
    07-31 11:50 AM
    Thank you for your prompt response

    1. Since company did not send me to USA after getting h1b visa 32 months back. Can he take legal action to pay liquidated charges? as mentioned below in the agreement.

    Extract from Agreement: If the employee terminates the agreement prior to the minimum period of 18 months, the employee will pay company liquidated charges of 4000 USD.

    2.Can New Jersy laws applicable in India to send a legal notice to me?

    3. Since I have not travelled to USA on H1B, Can I be called an Employee of that company who processed my H1B.

    4. Can I take any legal action against him as he did not send me to USA despite the fact that I renewed the Bank Guarantee twice.

    Pls answer the above 3 questions.




    camila amor eterno. juras de amor eterno se
  • juras de amor eterno se


  • gcformeornot
    12-31 01:05 PM
    bump



    more...

    camila amor eterno. Camila e Thiago: o amor eterno
  • Camila e Thiago: o amor eterno


  • RNGC
    04-08 09:38 PM
    As per INA 202, many of you know that for employment based immigration, the limit is 7% of 140k per country, if there are unused visas from family based or from previous years, USCIS should try to use them, which is not happenning....

    see a detailed notes on INA 202 here...
    http://boards.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?t=240387
    (search for gclong1)

    I am trying to understand why the 7% was set ? When the law was signed. Things have drastically changed, more skilled people are coming to US from India, shouldn't the law be changed ? I think we should start pushing for more employment based visas, double it to 300k. The 7% formula has to be revisited.

    Is 7% per country is fair ?
    ------------------------
    Legal Immigrant Source Source:
    http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/yearbook/2006/table03d.xls

    (More reports here...(http://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/statistics/publications/LPR06.shtm)

    Population Source:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_population


    Cuba: ( BTW, Cuba is just taken as a example just to explain the math)
    Total Population = 11,000,000 (11 Million)
    Total Population Percent = 0.17 %
    Legal Immigrants from Cuba to USA in 2006 = 45,614
    Percent of Legal Immigrants from Cuba to USA compared with their population in 2006 = 0.4146 %
    [(45614.0/11000000.0)*100.0 = 0.4146]

    India:
    Total Population = 1,131,264,000 (1.1 Billion)
    Total Population Percent = 17 %
    Legal Immigrants from India to USA in 2006= 61,369
    Percent of Legal Immigrants from India to USA compared with their population in 2006 = 0.0054
    [(61369.0/1131264000)*100.0 = 0.0054]

    Cuba has a 0.4146 Legal Immigrants in US per 100 of their population
    India has 0.0054 Legal Immigrants in US per 100 of their population

    What is the difference in percent ?
    (0.4146 - 0.0054)*100.0 = 40.92 % difference!!!!

    India constitute 17% of world population, Cuba constitute .17 % of world population, so if we go by a country's population in deciding the % of EB visas it gets...
    (17.0/100.0) * 140000.0 = 23,800 EB visas ?
    (0.17/100.0) * 140000.0 = 238 EB visas ?

    Soon, USA will be Chindia!

    I am not arguing that we should follow the above formula either, just like how India and Cuba both have 7% limit, which does not make sense, the above math also does not make sense....

    My argument is 7% per country limit for all countries, for a small country with 1 Million population and a big country with 1 B population does not make sense.

    So, two issues need to dealt with for long term solution.
    1. 140k EB visas to be increased to 300k
    2. 7% per country needs to be changed (not sure what should be the criteria)




    camila amor eterno. DO AMOR
  • DO AMOR


  • chandrajp
    08-15 03:56 PM
    Did you use AC21? how long ago you applied for 485?

    Yes, I used. But I did not inform USCIS when I switched jobs. The problem happened with my old employer's employment. It did not give good description of my job duties. That is the reason IO asked for the latest employment letter. I sent latest employment letter and three latest pay stubs and I think attorney might have attached a covering letter. After USCIS received on 06/19, I got approved on 06/29 this year



    more...

    camila amor eterno. Amor Eterno Camila
  • Amor Eterno Camila


  • sunilsj
    01-21 09:39 AM
    Read this link from Murthy.com:

    MurthyDotCom : H1B & H-4 Visa Applications in India Plagued by 221(g) Refusals - Part 1 (http://www.murthy.com/news/n_h14ind.html)




    camila amor eterno. Amor Eterno!
  • Amor Eterno!


  • ski_dude12
    01-31 01:41 PM
    Maybe it is because of your priority date :D:D:D.

    I have had similar looking bills when I was in PA.



    more...

    camila amor eterno. Amor Eterno.avi. Amor Eterno.avi. 6:30. Summer #39;O8 17th Street Market; ORIGINAL Mariachi Cascabel :).
  • Amor Eterno.avi. Amor Eterno.avi. 6:30. Summer #39;O8 17th Street Market; ORIGINAL Mariachi Cascabel :).


  • averagedesi
    09-08 01:21 AM
    When is your infopass appt?




    camila amor eterno. mi eterno amor secreto
  • mi eterno amor secreto


  • gsc999
    06-08 05:41 PM
    When the poor Irish came to US, was there a rule that said, they can get their papers sooner if they pay some extra money? Premium processing is creating e.
    --
    The premium processing fee is paid by the employer. Infact, all processing fee is paid by the employer. Am I missing something here?

    Why would someone argue against premium processing? ...Well people who think it is against their or American values better not apply for premium H1-B or premium I-140 processing :D



    more...

    camila amor eterno. paixão é um amor eterno!
  • paixão é um amor eterno!


  • gcformeornot
    02-11 08:15 PM
    I checked with attorney and they mentioned that I can continue on my L1 if I am with L1 employer OR if I am with H1 employer then I can be only on H1 status...

    As far as denial is concerned, I am still waiting for the notice...

    Does anyone has an idea... I heard from some of my friends that specially in case of L1B blanket, denial notice should talk about the problem and also about how to re-apply again.

    Also I got a feeling that my company may end up filing L1A as I have 8+ years of experience. Will that be any kind of problem...?

    Please suggest...

    Thanks,
    Gagan Chodhry

    replying to my question. Did you or did you not receive new I-94s?




    camila amor eterno. lindo amor eterno! s2
  • lindo amor eterno! s2


  • yabayaba
    10-11 10:35 AM
    It not the right time to start campaign. All policians will be busy in elections an they may not hear waht we say. After elections may be the right time to do.



    more...

    camila amor eterno. camilacasseb | #39;Amor Eterno#39;
  • camilacasseb | #39;Amor Eterno#39;


  • imm_pro
    05-20 01:13 PM
    http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26605

    looks like the Agjobs amendment tagged to this bill is drawing lot of attention and negative publicity..

    This is why we keep close watch on Congress. In a bipartisan effort accomplished quickly and virtually under the table, Sens. Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Sen. Larry Craig (R-Idaho) -- in Senate Appropriations markup of the War Supplemental bill -- obtained approval of an amendment that would create an amnesty for illegal alien farm workers. The measure, called the Emergency Agriculture Relief Act, was added to the War Supplemental bill in a 17-12 vote last Thursday.

    Known as the AgJob amendment, the Feinstein-Craig measure revived instantaneously the controversy that caused conservatives to lash out at the White House and Congress last summer.

    The measure would grant temporary legal status to 1.35 million illegal immigrants and their families currently working in the agricultural field. The legislation was passed out of committee at the request of agribusiness interests who have been insisting that they need illegal aliens to harvest crops and run horse shows. The legislation is nothing less than �comprehensive immigration reform� on a smaller scale.

    What supporters of the amendment are calling �emergency� and �temporary�, opponents have labeled an �amnesty visa.� Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV) said he considered the amendment amnesty and that �all these immigration issues should be addressed through the regular order."
    Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) opposes the amendment and said he will be working to remove it from the supplemental bill.

    �Instead of ensuring that American troops are provided with the tools and resources that they need to protect our homeland, some in the Senate have instead chosen to jeopardize this funding by inserting provisions that are -- at best -- counterproductive to the efforts of our military members,� said Vitter in a press release.

    According to Feinstein, the legislation is supported by the American Farm Bureau, the United Farm Workers, and other similar organizations but this is likely because it allows those employers to continue paying excessively low wages.

    Feinstein assured the Appropriations Committee that the bill was not an amnesty because it requires the individuals work at least 100 days a year in the agricultural industry for the next five years.

    �It is an emergency agricultural worker bill, which will give protected status to those workers who have worked in agriculture within the last 48 months,� she said, also noting that the U.S. would lose $5-9 billion to foreign competition without it.

    Those are the same arguments that we heard last summer. In truth, Feinstein-Craig DOES provide amnesty for an unknown number of illegal workers. It provides, as the Bush-McCain-Kennedy bill did, a path to citizenship for some illegal aliens.

    The amendment will go through the Senate this week as they consider the Iraq spending bill as a whole. At this writing, it isn�t clear that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) will bring the measure to the floor for a vote.

    NumbersUSA, an organization fighting illegal immigration, called the amendment �outrageous� and urged constituents to contact their political leaders. They noted that because families can also obtain temporary legal status through the amendment, it could reach almost 3 million people.

    �The most important point to stress is that there is no need for an amnesty to provide growers with workers�there already is an H-2A foreign agricultural worker program that provides growers with an unlimited number of temporary workers if the growers agree to pay a decent wage and ensure that they go home at the end of the season,� said NumbersUSA news release.

    Some farming organizations, like the Northwest Growers Association, not only support the measure but don�t think it does enough. They claim the AgJobs amendment doesn�t do enough for illegal aliens because it includes an �unrealistic visa cap.�

    But the H-2A visa program exists and works without a cap. While Craig and others claim �oranges are rotting� on trees and needs illegal aliens to tend to our agriculture, places like the North Carolina Grower�s Association (NCGA, spotlighted on Michelle Malkin�s blog), oppose the amendment and have fared well with H-2A. NCGA utilizes H-2A to its fullest capacity as other agricultural organizations do not.

    Additionally, AgJobs would maximize H-2B visas (lower skill, non-agricultural seasonal workers) and push an influx of more illegal immigrants, which clashes with what the American people want. They demonstrated their disapproval of amnesty proposals last year by a bipartisan grassroots effort to kill the immigration reform bill of 2007.

    Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md) also slipped in an amendment supporting illegal immigrants in the supplemental bill. Mikulski hopes to extend a program for temporary workers to re-enter the country without being subject to the limits on H2B visas. In a Congress Daily article, she said, "If you like Maryland crabs, vote for this amendment.�

    "It seems that the members of the Senate Appropriations Committee love our troops�but for entirely different reasons: they provide convenient cover for passing special interest legislation to benefit illegal aliens and powerful business lobbies," wrote Ira Mehlman, Media Director of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) in an opinion piece yesterday.

    Mehlman also reported that Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wa.) added a provision that would include 218,000 visas for skilled foreign workers. Part of the problem is this: Right now, America�s population is 300 million. At the rate we are going with illegal immigrants (sped up by amendments like these), the US Census Bureau estimates the population will be 450 million by 2050. If a Democrat, entitlement-oriented government sinks its teeth in, taxes will be higher than ever and freedom will be in jeopardy.

    The Senate will begin debate on the supplemental bill tomorrow and is likely to vote on it before the end of the week. Some Republican senators -- including Alabama�s Jeff Sessions and others -- are working hard to expunge the illegal alien amnesty provisions. The only thing that may save the day is that the Democrats are including many of the antiwar measures that the president has vetoed in previous bills. If the bill passes, it�s likely to be vetoed.

    And Congress will be back to ground zero after Memorial Day.




    camila amor eterno. Rocio Durcal - Amor Eterno
  • Rocio Durcal - Amor Eterno


  • newlife2
    09-19 10:40 PM
    Guys, I was just laid off and have efiled i539 3 days after the termination date for a status change to F2. Now working on the application letter. Do you think I should mention the layoff in the letter?

    If I do mention it:

    Con: The layoff might quickly catch the eyes of the immigration officer and if he want to check my status, he could find out the 3 days OOS.

    Pro: My previous job was well paid. By mentioning it, I give the reason that why I want to stay at home as F2 instead of keeping the well paid job.


    I guess I will mention it in the letter to explain the whole situation and hope everything will be all right. Let me know if anybody disagrees asap, I will mail out the stuff with in next two days.



    more...

    camila amor eterno. João Nicolas- Amor eterno. João Nicolas- Amor eterno. 4:36. Video produzido pelo papai Anderson em homenagem ao mais novo membro da familia: João Nicolas.
  • João Nicolas- Amor eterno. João Nicolas- Amor eterno. 4:36. Video produzido pelo papai Anderson em homenagem ao mais novo membro da familia: João Nicolas.


  • tkasi
    07-27 12:04 PM
    Hi,

    My I-94 which was issued 2 years ago in the port of entry got expired(this I-94 was based on my previous employer "ABC". I have applied for H1 extention and got my 797 extended with new I-94 recently with my new employer "XYZ".

    My question is which I-94 details should I use while filing my 485. Obviously my labor was filed by "XYZ" company.

    Regards
    Kasi




    camila amor eterno. ellas “Amor Eterno” y un
  • ellas “Amor Eterno” y un


  • cooldude0807
    06-01 05:10 PM
    I recd an RFE too even though i filed AC21 in feb. My lawyer sent the required docs & from May26th there has been a soft LUD everyday...the status says "Response to request for evidence received, and case processing has resumed". Also there is no RFE on my wife's case.



    more...

    camila amor eterno. quando eterno
  • quando eterno


  • pmb76
    09-05 09:30 PM
    I finally got my AP, 15 days after my EAD (100 days total) . I was happy to open the packet, until this......

    THEY SENT ME MY AP WITH SOMEONE ELSE'S PICTURE!!!!!!!

    Everything else is Correct (address, DOB, A# etc...)

    GURUS, please advise what should I do...... I am so pissed!!!!! Thankfully my EAD has the correct pic.... I had done an E-file....June 7th and my previous AP expires Sept 20

    Do ypu remember that Seinfeld episode where Costanza airbrushes off himself from the picture in Kruger's office. You could try something similar.. Just kidding :D. My sympathies are with you dear friend. Murphy's law always holds true when it comes to dealing with USCIS.




    camila amor eterno. Postado por camila às 17:57 0
  • Postado por camila às 17:57 0


  • kaisersose
    08-29 09:22 PM
    Un"un: Unknown :)




    camila amor eterno. Amor eterno
  • Amor eterno


  • yabadaba
    06-24 12:42 PM
    bump^^^^




    chanduv23
    04-21 01:44 PM
    If I485 is denied for wrong reason (due to USCIS error), I understand that the application and attorney can file a MTR, but during the time till the case is reopened again, is it legal for the employee to work on EAD?

    My assumption here is once the denial notice is received, it may take few weeks/months to gather the necessary information, send it to USCIS and then the case gets reopened.

    This is a grey area subject to interpretations. Talk to an Anttorney - the reason I say this is - when your 485 gets denied wrongfully (your Attorney will tell you if the REASON was wrongful) - say AC21 old employer revoke 140 after 180 days - then an MOTIC whould resolve your issue - which typically takes a few weeks to 2 months or a bit more. Whether you stay here or work here - it is the same - no "Particular status". Once your MOTIC gets approved, you are back in status - so it is a big grey area subject to interpretation and Attorneys have different views based on how conservative one wants to be.

    If you are sure your 485 can get denied for a "right reason" - then MTR or Appeal may not work - so you have to work out other options.




    maco
    08-10 11:09 AM
    I got the info from my friends attorney.
    i want to verify it with my attorney but he is not lifiting phone. he is too busy



    Aucun commentaire:

    Enregistrer un commentaire